Revision Notes MCQ Bank SAQ Bank Study Cards Courses Teachers Blog

CP 4 Preparation of a Standard Solution

Core Practical 4 for Edexcel International A Level Chemistry: prepare a standard solution of sulfamic acid, H₂NSO₃H, by weighing by difference and making up to 250.0 cm³, then titrate it against sodium hydroxide with methyl orange.

Method with reasons, corrected sample data, worked calculation to 0.0796 mol dm⁻³, percentage uncertainties and the errors that push the answer high or low.

Exam board: Edexcel International
Unit 3: WCH13/01
Core Practical 4

Standard Solution and Titration

Make a 250 cm³ standard solution of sulfamic acid, H₂NSO₃H, by weighing by difference, then titrate it against sodium hydroxide to find the concentration of the alkali.

0:00 / 3:34

© Dr. Mohammed Al-Fatah – onlinelearningsystem.net

Before you start

GCSE Recap: Acids, Alkalis and Titrations

Four quick questions on the GCSE ideas this practical builds on: neutralisation, what a titration measures, which apparatus measures a fixed volume and how concentration is calculated.

1

Using the Volumetric Flask Correctly

Volumetric flask technique: calibrated to contain 250.0 cm³ at 20 °C, bottom of the meniscus on the line at eye level, cool the solution before filling, stopper and invert to mix.

A volumetric flask has a single calibration line on its narrow neck. It is calibrated to contain 250.0 cm³ at 20 °C when the bottom of the meniscus sits exactly on that line.

The narrow neck is what makes it precise, because a small error in height is a very small error in volume.

A 250 cm³ measuring cylinder, by contrast, has an uncertainty of about ±1 cm³ or more, which is why it is never used to make a standard solution.

Fill to about 1 cm below the line with the wash bottle, then finish with a dropping pipette so that you cannot overshoot.

Read the mark with your eye level with the line: looking down on it makes the meniscus appear too high and causes parallax error.

If the level does go above the line the solution must be thrown away and the preparation started again, because there is no way of knowing how much extra water was added.

Never heat a volumetric flask or pour a warm solution into it. The reason is the liquid, not the glass.

A warm solution contracts as it cools, so a flask filled to the line while warm ends up below the line at 20 °C, the volume is less than 250.0 cm³ and the concentration is higher than the calculation says.

Glass expansion is a much smaller effect. Cool the beaker to room temperature before transferring.

Exam wording: Say “make up to the mark with distilled water”, never “fill it up”. Say “the bottom of the meniscus on the calibration line at eye level” and, for a warm solution, “the liquid contracts on cooling so the volume falls below the mark”.

Check your understanding

Check: Concentration from a Weighing

Turn a pair of weighings and a flask volume into a concentration for a different primary standard, then predict the effect of a lost washing.

2

Carrying Out the Titration

The titration set-up: sulfamic acid in the burette read from the bottom of the meniscus with the funnel removed, 25.0 cm³ of sodium hydroxide and methyl orange in the flask on a white tile, and the yellow, orange and red colour sequence.

The sulfamic acid solution goes in the burette; 25.0 cm³ of sodium hydroxide measured with a volumetric pipette goes in the conical flask with 2 to 3 drops of methyl orange.

Methyl orange is yellow in alkali and red in acid, so the flask starts yellow and the end point is the first permanent orange. Going on to red means the end point has been passed and the titre is too large.

Exam tip: The indicator colour change is a certain mark in the practical paper and the live page never gave it; write it out as “yellow to orange”.

Technique points that score: rinse the burette with the acid and the pipette with the alkali; fill the burette below eye level and remove the funnel before reading; make sure the jet below the tap is full of acid.

Read the bottom of the meniscus at eye level and record to 0.05 cm³; stand the flask on a white tile; run a rough titration first.

Near the end point add acid drop by drop with continuous swirling and rinse the sides of the flask with distilled water; repeat until two titres are concordant, within 0.20 cm³ of each other.

Water in the conical flask does not matter: the moles of sodium hydroxide were fixed when 25.0 cm³ was pipetted, and extra water only dilutes them without changing their number.

Water in the pipette or the burette does matter, because it dilutes a solution before its volume is measured.

Common mistake: Students lose marks by drying the conical flask “to be accurate” and by rinsing the pipette with water only.

Why only 2 to 3 drops: Indicators are weak acids, so each drop reacts with a little of the sodium hydroxide and makes the titre slightly larger; a heavy colour also hides the exact moment the end point is reached.

Check your understanding

Check: Indicator Colour Changes

Place the right colours on methyl orange and phenolphthalein titrations run in either direction.

3

What This Practical Is Testing

Core Practical 4 has two connected parts. First you make a standard solution of sulfamic acid, H₂NSO₃H (also written H₃NSO₃).

This is a solution whose concentration is known accurately because it was made from a weighed mass of a pure solid in a known volume.

Then you use that acid in an acid-base titration to find the concentration of a sodium hydroxide solution.

The chain of reasoning is: mass of solid gives moles of acid; the 250.0 cm³ volumetric flask gives the acid concentration.

The titre gives the moles of acid that react with 25.0 cm³ of alkali; the equation gives the moles of alkali; the pipette volume gives its concentration.

The relative formula mass is needed at the first step, and students lose marks by copying a wrong value: Mr(H₂NSO₃H) = 3 × 1.0 + 14.0 + 32.1 + 3 × 16.0 = 97.1. Sulfamic acid is monoprotic, so one mole of acid neutralises one mole of sodium hydroxide:

H₂NSO₃H(aq) + NaOH(aq) → H₂NSO₃Na(aq) + H₂O(l)

A solid that can be weighed out to make a standard solution directly is a primary standard.

It must be available in high purity, stable in air (not hygroscopic or deliquescent, and not reacting with carbon dioxide), soluble in water, and have a reasonably high Mr so that weighing errors are a small fraction of the mass.

Sulfamic acid meets all of these, which is why it is chosen.

Sodium hydroxide fails the test: the pellets absorb water and carbon dioxide from the air while they sit on the balance, so their mass never gives their moles. Its concentration has to be found by titration against a primary standard instead.

The skills are examined in the Unit 3 practical skills paper (WCH13), which asks for methods, apparatus choices, data processing, uncertainty and evaluation.

On this practical that means being able to describe weighing by difference, the transfer with washings, the volumetric flask technique, the titration technique, and the choice of indicator and its colour change.

It also means the treatment of titres, the calculation to 3 significant figures and the percentage uncertainty of each measurement.

Key idea: A standard solution is made from a primary standard: pure, stable, weighable. Every rinse, reading and volume in this practical feeds straight into the final concentration, so every technique point has a calculation consequence.

Check your understanding

Check: Choosing a Primary Standard

Decide which solids could be weighed out to make a standard solution, and why the others cannot.

4

Safety and Apparatus

Sulfamic acid is an irritant to the skin and eyes. Sodium hydroxide at about 0.1 mol dm⁻³ is also an irritant (it is classed as corrosive above about 0.5 mol dm⁻³).

Wear eye protection throughout, avoid skin contact with both solutions and wash any spill off the skin with plenty of water.

Fill the burette below eye level using a small funnel so that acid cannot splash into your face, and remove the funnel before taking a reading. Clamp the burette firmly: a full burette in a loose clamp can tip and shatter.

Exam wording: Hazard questions want the classification and the precaution together: “sulfamic acid is an irritant, so wear eye protection and wash spills off the skin with water”.

A hazard is not the same as a risk: the hazard is the property, the risk is the chance of harm in this procedure.

5

Method: Step by Step

The method has nine steps. Each one carries its reason, because the reasons are what the mark scheme rewards: “rinse the beaker” scores nothing on its own, “rinse the beaker so that all of the acid reaches the flask” scores the mark.

Technique point: Rinse each piece of glassware with the solution it will hold: burette with the acid, pipette with the alkali. Rinse with distilled water only where extra water does not matter: the conical flask and the volumetric flask before use.

Check your understanding

Check: Order the Method

Put the steps of a standard-solution preparation in a workable order for a different solid.

6

Preparing the Standard Solution: Sample Data

Weighing by difference gives the mass that really reached the beaker.

In the sample run the weighing bottle plus sulfamic acid read m₁ = 14.86 g; after the solid had been tipped into the beaker the bottle plus residue read m₂ = 12.45 g.

Mass of sulfamic acid used = 14.86 − 12.45 = 2.41 g.

Common mistake: Students lose marks by weighing the bottle empty first and then assuming every grain was transferred: the residue left behind is exactly what the m₁ − m₂ method allows for.

The solid was dissolved in about 100 cm³ of distilled water, transferred with washings and made up to 250.0 cm³. Two sums follow, and they are the first two steps of the full calculation later on the page:

n(H₂NSO₃H) = m ÷ Mr = 2.41 g ÷ 97.1 g mol⁻¹ = 0.02482 mol (carry the unrounded value)

c(H₂NSO₃H) = n ÷ V = 0.02482 mol ÷ 0.2500 dm³ = 0.0993 mol dm⁻³ (3 s.f.)

Notice that the volume is written in dm³ before it is used: 250.0 cm³ ÷ 1000 = 0.2500 dm³. If the rounded 0.0248 mol were divided by 0.250 dm³ the answer would come out as 0.0992 mol dm⁻³, so keep one extra figure until the final answer and round once.

Exam focus: A lost washing and an overfilled flask have the same direction of error.

The acid in the flask is weaker than the calculation assumes, the titre gets bigger, and the alkali concentration comes out too high. Say which value is wrong and in which direction.

7

From Burette Readings to Titres

A titre is the volume delivered from the burette: titre = final burette reading − initial burette reading. Every reading is recorded to 0.05 cm³, so titres are quoted to 2 d.p.

The first titration is a rough titre, run quickly to locate the end point; it is labelled as such and is never used in the mean, even if it happens to be close.

Concordant titres are accurate titres that agree within 0.20 cm³ of each other; only those are averaged, and the mean is quoted to 2 d.p.

TitrationInitial burette reading / cm³Final burette reading / cm³Titre / cm³Used in mean?
Rough0.2521.0020.75No: rough titre
221.0041.0020.00Yes
30.5020.8520.35No: not concordant
420.8540.9520.10Yes

Mean titre = (20.00 + 20.10) ÷ 2 = 20.05 cm³.

Titre 3 is 0.35 cm³ above titre 2 and 0.25 cm³ above titre 4, so it fails the concordance test on either common rule and is left out.

Common mistake: Students lose marks by averaging all four values (which gives 20.30 cm³) or by treating “concordant” as “identical”: two titres do not have to match exactly, they have to fall within the stated limit.

Exam wording: “Titres 2 and 4 are concordant because they agree within 0.20 cm³ of each other; the rough titre and titre 3 are not used. Mean titre = 20.05 cm³.” Name the titres used and give the mean to 2 d.p.

Check your understanding

Check: Reading a Burette Table

Work out the titres from a new set of burette readings, choose the concordant ones and find the mean.

8

Worked Calculation Ladder

The mass of sulfamic acid is 2.41 g and the mean titre is 20.05 cm³. Every step is shown with its unit, and the unrounded value is carried from step to step.

The final answer is given to 3 significant figures because the mass (2.41 g) and the titres (20.05 cm³, 25.0 cm³) are known to 3 significant figures.

StepWorkingResult
1 Moles of sulfamic acid maden = m ÷ Mr = 2.41 ÷ 97.10.02482 mol
2 Concentration of the acidc = n ÷ V = 0.02482 ÷ 0.2500 dm³0.0993 mol dm⁻³
3 Moles of acid in the mean titren = c × V = 0.0993 × 0.02005 dm³0.001991 mol
4 Mole ratioH₂NSO₃H(aq) + NaOH(aq) → H₂NSO₃Na(aq) + H₂O(l), so the ratio is 1 : 1 and n(NaOH) = n(acid)0.001991 mol
5 Concentration of the alkalic = n ÷ V = 0.001991 ÷ 0.0250 dm³0.0796 mol dm⁻³ (3 s.f.)

Two checks on the answer. First, the units: mol ÷ dm³ gives mol dm⁻³ at steps 2 and 5, and mol dm⁻³ × dm³ gives mol at step 3.

Second, the sense: the titre (20.05 cm³) is a little less than the pipette volume (25.0 cm³), so for a 1 : 1 reaction the alkali must be a little less concentrated than the acid, and 0.0796 is indeed a little less than 0.0993.

Common mistake: A student who gets 79.6 or 0.000796 mol dm⁻³ has slipped a factor of 1000 by leaving a volume in cm³.

Exam wording: Write the mole ratio as a line of working with the equation beside it: “H₂NSO₃H : NaOH = 1 : 1, so n(NaOH) = 0.00199 mol”. Asserting the ratio without the equation loses the reasoning mark.

9

Errors, Uncertainty and Improvements

The percentage uncertainty of a measurement is (uncertainty ÷ reading) × 100. A mass by difference and a titre each come from two readings, so their uncertainties are doubled before dividing. Using the sample data:

MeasurementUncertaintyWorkingPercentage uncertainty
Mass of acid, 2.41 g2 × ±0.005 g = ±0.01 g0.01 ÷ 2.41 × 1000.41 %
Titre, 20.05 cm³2 × ±0.05 cm³ = ±0.10 cm³0.10 ÷ 20.05 × 1000.50 %
Pipette, 25.0 cm³±0.06 cm³0.06 ÷ 25.0 × 1000.24 %
Volumetric flask, 250.0 cm³±0.15 cm³ (class A)0.15 ÷ 250.0 × 1000.06 % (0.12 % for a class B flask, ±0.30 cm³)
TotalAdd the percentages0.41 + 0.50 + 0.24 + 0.06about 1.2 %

The burette contributes most, so the improvement that pays is a larger titre: a 50 cm³ pipette of alkali, or a slightly less concentrated acid, roughly halves the burette percentage.

Weighing more solid would reduce the balance term, but 2.4 g already gives under half a percent. The flask and pipette are so precise that swapping them changes little.

Percentage uncertainties are measurement limits, and they are different from the technique errors below, which push the answer in one direction.

Exam wording: “The percentage uncertainty in the titre is 0.10 ÷ 20.05 × 100 = 0.50 %. Using a larger volume of alkali would give a larger titre and reduce this.” State the uncertainty, the working and the improvement that reduces it.

Check your understanding

Check: A Diprotic Standard

Run a full titration calculation for ethanedioic acid dihydrate, including a 1 : 2 ratio and the titre uncertainty.

10

Common Mistakes

  • Leaving a volume in cm³: divide by 1000 before using c = n ÷ V; an answer of 79.6 mol dm⁻³ for a dilute alkali should ring alarm bells.
  • Averaging every titre, including the rough one, or treating only identical titres as concordant.
  • Rounding too early: 0.0248 ÷ 0.250 gives 0.0992, while the unrounded 0.02482 gives 0.0993. Carry an extra figure and round once at the end to 3 s.f.
  • Weighing the empty bottle first and assuming every grain was transferred; weigh the bottle with the acid, then with the residue.
  • Reading the top of the meniscus, leaving the funnel in the burette, or starting with an air bubble in the jet.
  • Not swirling, so the end point appears early in one part of the flask, or going on past orange to red.
  • Too much indicator: 2 to 3 drops, because the indicator is itself a weak acid that reacts with some of the alkali.
  • Drying the conical flask “for accuracy”: water in the flask changes nothing, since the moles of alkali were fixed by the pipette.
  • Asserting the 1 : 1 ratio without writing the equation, or applying 1 : 1 to a diprotic acid or a carbonate.
  • Quoting 0.079612 mol dm⁻³: five or six significant figures cannot be justified by 3 s.f. data.
Check your understanding

Check: What Each Slip Does

In each round, choose the statement that correctly describes the effect of a slip in making or using a standard solution.

11

Common Exam Points

Say

“Weigh the bottle with the acid, tip it out, reweigh the bottle with any residue: mass used = m₁ − m₂.”

“Rinse the beaker, rod and funnel and add the washings so that all of the acid reaches the flask.”

“Bottom of the meniscus on the line at eye level.” “Methyl orange turns from yellow to orange.”

“Titres concordant within 0.20 cm³ of each other; mean to 2 d.p.; answer to 3 s.f.”

Do not say

“Fill the flask up” (make up to the mark). “Concordant means the same” (within the stated limit). “Heating the flask expands the glass” (the liquid contracts on cooling). “Dry the conical flask” (water there does not matter). “Sulfamic acid : NaOH is 1 : 1” without the equation.

Watch for

Calculation questions that swap the primary standard for a carbonate or a diprotic acid: read the equation for the ratio.

Uncertainty questions: two readings for a mass by difference and for a titre, so double the instrument uncertainty before dividing.

Evaluation questions: say whether the alkali concentration comes out too high or too low, and why.

Related technique on Core Practical 3 (concentration of hcl by titration) and, for the same volumetric glassware used in gas work, Core Practical 1 (molar volume of a gas).

FAQs

Short answers to the questions Edexcel International examiners ask most often about Core Practical 4.

Why is sulfamic acid used as the primary standard and not sodium hydroxide?

Sulfamic acid is a pure, stable crystalline solid that does not absorb water or carbon dioxide from the air and has a reasonably high Mr (97.1), so a weighed mass gives its moles directly.

Sodium hydroxide pellets absorb water and carbon dioxide while they are being weighed, so their mass never gives an accurate number of moles; its concentration has to be found by titration against a primary standard.

Why is a volumetric flask used instead of a measuring cylinder?

A 250 cm³ volumetric flask is calibrated to contain exactly 250.0 cm³ at 20 °C when the bottom of the meniscus sits on its single line, with an uncertainty of only ±0.15 cm³ (class A).

A measuring cylinder of the same size has an uncertainty of ±1 cm³ or more, and its wide bore makes the meniscus hard to place.

Why is the burette rinsed with the acid and the pipette with the alkali?

Any water left inside would dilute the solution before its volume is measured.

A diluted acid in the burette gives a titre that is too large; a diluted alkali in the pipette puts fewer moles into the flask and gives a titre that is too small.

Rinsing each with the solution it will hold removes the problem.

What colour change is seen, and when do you stop?

Methyl orange is yellow in the sodium hydroxide and red in acid.

As sulfamic acid is added from the burette the flask stays yellow, flickers orange with swirling near the end point, and the titration stops at the first permanent orange colour.

Red means the end point has been overshot and the titre is too large.

Why is the rough titre not used in the mean?

The rough titre is run quickly to find roughly where the end point is, so the acid is added in large portions and the end point is usually overshot.

It is not an accurate measurement and it is excluded even if it happens to fall close to the accurate titres. Only concordant accurate titres are averaged.

Why does water in the conical flask not matter, when water in the pipette does?

The moles of sodium hydroxide are fixed when 25.0 cm³ is pipetted into the flask; adding water afterwards dilutes them but does not change their number, so the titre is unchanged.

Water in the pipette dilutes the alkali before it is measured, so 25.0 cm³ then contains fewer moles.

What happens to the answer if the volumetric flask is filled above the mark?

The acid is more dilute than the calculation assumes, because the student still uses 250.0 cm³. A larger titre is needed to neutralise the 25.0 cm³ of alkali, and the calculated alkali concentration comes out too high. The only remedy is to start the preparation again.

Dr. Mohammed Al-Fatah

Written by: Dr. Mohammed Al-Fatah

Chemistry specialist revision notes for International A Level Chemistry.

View LinkedIn Profile

Copyright notice: This OLS revision content, including the explanations, layout, diagrams, tables and embedded learning structure, is authored for Online Learning System by Dr. Mohammed Al-Fatah. It may not be copied, reproduced, redistributed or adapted without written permission.